This article is for subscribers only.
Please NoteExisting members: if you have not logged in since August 21, 2012 please reset your password before logging in as we have transitioned to a new system that requires a new password.
If you are already a Design Futures Council member or DesignIntelligence yearly subscriber, and don't have an account, please contact us and we will set it up for you.
A dilemma and course of action for architectural education Read full »
Innovation transforms the customer as well as the product Read full »
The following criteria were used to score world-class programs:
Results of the 2010 DesignIntelligence landscape architecture rankings by professional practices.
Historical results of the six years of DesignIntelligence landscape architecture rankings by professional practices.
Results of DesignIntelligence landscape architecture deans and chairs surveys from 2008, 2009, and 2010, which solicits opinions about respected programs as well as outstanding educators and education leaders.
Independent analysis and opinion by DesignIntelligence editors and Greenway Group analysts of overall campus environment for learning, technology resources, opportunities for integrated learning, skills assessment, and regional preference derived from surveys.
DesignIntelligence considers Landscape Architecture Accreditation Board accreditation to be a minimum standard for world-class status. LAAB analysis provides for a single standard for both undergraduate and graduate programs, so a standard score was used for each program.
DI.net RSS Feeds
DI.net on Twitter
- Steve Jobs' 13 Most Inspiring Quotes - Business Insider ow.ly/vVtec4 hours ago by @dinet
- Origami Houses: Tables That Become Shelters When Disaster Strikes | ArchDaily ow.ly/vVqga7 hours ago by @dinet
- SketchUp Announces Mobile Viewer for iPad | ArchDaily ow.ly/vVQrF8 hours ago by @dinet